Given the rate of our current leaps of understanding, 100 years is a very long time.
I'm fairly certain that by 3009, we will have, in a sense, abandoned "technology" as we know it now.
Science, will look much more like art. A shift of focus from "figuring things out/how do things work?" to "finding new things to do and new ways to do them, new things to create, new ways to create them" will have occurred I feel. Having passed a threshold of realization that there is "nothing to know", as-it-were.
I think that, in a global sense, people will naturally gravitate to areas of the planet that resonate with them and what they wish to do, such that, from our perspective now, a traveler to the future might feel that some kind of "segregation" is taking place. Though this won't really be the case.
Rather it's simply that we will recognize the natural resonance of individual to location to activities in interconnectedness and will, in a general sense, gravitate to those areas/groups that facilitate what we wish to experience for a given period. There will be "overlap" as-it-were in a sense and individuals will not necessarily contain themselves long-term to specific areas and groupings.
Our sense of time will continue but become much more flexible. Rather than feeling we are trapped by time, or working against the clock, it will be more of a cooperation between time and what we wish to accomplish. Using time for manifestation, much as we do now, but with more awareness of doing so.
To return to "technology" for a moment, I think that the "machines" that we will have at that point, to individuals alive now, would look much simpler, more organic and in fact, will be in a sense. For I feel that much of our technology will be about light, sound, color...vibration, resonance.
Thus, things that manipulate these will be more prevalent. Different forms of crystal, objects like tuning forks, drums and other similar instruments, our own voices and probably a lot of other "tools" that would be hard to imagine right now.
Acquisition, will be a thing of the past, at least on a mass scale. Trade, the harvesting of resources on a large scale, these types of things will be gone.
Even if we are not as far advanced on other things as I feel we will be, I would say I foresee a "replication" technology that will replace our use of this within the next 50 years, maximum.
We are already creating diamonds that experts can't tell from the real thing, understanding the molecular and atomic composition of things. With nano-technology and this understanding, molecular replication really only requires energy and data-storage/exchange for this to become a reality. We're getting more energy out of less resources every day and the potential of discovery of a new energy source is always there.
Data-storage/exchange has just taken a new leap with holographic data storage and should be more commercially available shortly. Not to mention what can happen if we truly do get "Quantum Computers" working in the next 5-10 years.
So, data-manipulation is not going to be an issue for charting the breakdown and reconstitution of molecular materials. Energy is really our only hitch of the moment.
As soon as the cost of replicating a resource becomes less than mining or otherwise acquiring a resource, things will shift dramatically in this area I feel. And, this will happen the quickest with those expensive materials that are already difficult to harvest, or are extremely limited in quantity.
To combine the ideas above, "replication" technology, will be a great deal about light, sound and vibration/resonance. Complicated machines will do the work of "coaxing" molecules to alter their construction, moving an atom here, an atom there.
However, with a deep awareness of interconnectedness, instruments that make sound and light, mirrors/lenses for focusing and other such simple instruments, "artists" could achieve this as well. Imagine that, instead of simply going to a "concert" to listen to music, the artists are producing "music" that turns a brick of lead into gold. Not that we will care about gold, but you probably get the point.
You go to a restaurant and the "cooks" and "musicians" are one in the same.
Now, for this all to happen, we will of course also be advanced in "biotech", in a sense. Here, I'm not talking about "cyborgs", although, I think that will be on the path to such understanding. I'm talking about "biologic" and "biofeedback" and other "body consciousness" techniques that we come to understand and master.
Hints of what I am talking about are already within our experience. A vocalist can shatter glass with her voice. Physical records continue to be broken and seem to have no upper limit. Whether running, free diving or jumping. We continue to push the threshold farther.
Being able to produce sounds with our voice that, right now, would seem impossible, will really only take a true understanding of our bodies and our sense of interconnectedness with them. Vocalization is really simply a matter of muscle control, vs. what we believe our limitations to be. And, already we have examples of individuals doing fantastic or seemingly impossible things with their bodies.
And, I'm sure that there is far more waiting to be discovered.
I think some individuals become a bit confused at all the talk of energy. Many still making this some sublime, elusive or intangible. Yet, when we stop and think about it, energy is everything. Sounds, light, color, frequency, all interweaving and interacting to produce everything.
They are already using sound to levitate objects, (acoustic levitation) not just in laboratory experiments, but in manufacturing where they don't want the friction of object on object contact. Mainly in microchip construction.
In any case, as I said at the beginning, 100 years is a long time in terms of discovery, invention, understanding. Especially given where we are now.
I think reality is going to look very different, personally.
Peace.
I'm fairly certain that by 3009, we will have, in a sense, abandoned "technology" as we know it now.
Science, will look much more like art. A shift of focus from "figuring things out/how do things work?" to "finding new things to do and new ways to do them, new things to create, new ways to create them" will have occurred I feel. Having passed a threshold of realization that there is "nothing to know", as-it-were.
I think that, in a global sense, people will naturally gravitate to areas of the planet that resonate with them and what they wish to do, such that, from our perspective now, a traveler to the future might feel that some kind of "segregation" is taking place. Though this won't really be the case.
Rather it's simply that we will recognize the natural resonance of individual to location to activities in interconnectedness and will, in a general sense, gravitate to those areas/groups that facilitate what we wish to experience for a given period. There will be "overlap" as-it-were in a sense and individuals will not necessarily contain themselves long-term to specific areas and groupings.
Our sense of time will continue but become much more flexible. Rather than feeling we are trapped by time, or working against the clock, it will be more of a cooperation between time and what we wish to accomplish. Using time for manifestation, much as we do now, but with more awareness of doing so.
To return to "technology" for a moment, I think that the "machines" that we will have at that point, to individuals alive now, would look much simpler, more organic and in fact, will be in a sense. For I feel that much of our technology will be about light, sound, color...vibration, resonance.
Thus, things that manipulate these will be more prevalent. Different forms of crystal, objects like tuning forks, drums and other similar instruments, our own voices and probably a lot of other "tools" that would be hard to imagine right now.
Acquisition, will be a thing of the past, at least on a mass scale. Trade, the harvesting of resources on a large scale, these types of things will be gone.
Even if we are not as far advanced on other things as I feel we will be, I would say I foresee a "replication" technology that will replace our use of this within the next 50 years, maximum.
We are already creating diamonds that experts can't tell from the real thing, understanding the molecular and atomic composition of things. With nano-technology and this understanding, molecular replication really only requires energy and data-storage/exchange for this to become a reality. We're getting more energy out of less resources every day and the potential of discovery of a new energy source is always there.
Data-storage/exchange has just taken a new leap with holographic data storage and should be more commercially available shortly. Not to mention what can happen if we truly do get "Quantum Computers" working in the next 5-10 years.
So, data-manipulation is not going to be an issue for charting the breakdown and reconstitution of molecular materials. Energy is really our only hitch of the moment.
As soon as the cost of replicating a resource becomes less than mining or otherwise acquiring a resource, things will shift dramatically in this area I feel. And, this will happen the quickest with those expensive materials that are already difficult to harvest, or are extremely limited in quantity.
To combine the ideas above, "replication" technology, will be a great deal about light, sound and vibration/resonance. Complicated machines will do the work of "coaxing" molecules to alter their construction, moving an atom here, an atom there.
However, with a deep awareness of interconnectedness, instruments that make sound and light, mirrors/lenses for focusing and other such simple instruments, "artists" could achieve this as well. Imagine that, instead of simply going to a "concert" to listen to music, the artists are producing "music" that turns a brick of lead into gold. Not that we will care about gold, but you probably get the point.
You go to a restaurant and the "cooks" and "musicians" are one in the same.
Now, for this all to happen, we will of course also be advanced in "biotech", in a sense. Here, I'm not talking about "cyborgs", although, I think that will be on the path to such understanding. I'm talking about "biologic" and "biofeedback" and other "body consciousness" techniques that we come to understand and master.
Hints of what I am talking about are already within our experience. A vocalist can shatter glass with her voice. Physical records continue to be broken and seem to have no upper limit. Whether running, free diving or jumping. We continue to push the threshold farther.
Being able to produce sounds with our voice that, right now, would seem impossible, will really only take a true understanding of our bodies and our sense of interconnectedness with them. Vocalization is really simply a matter of muscle control, vs. what we believe our limitations to be. And, already we have examples of individuals doing fantastic or seemingly impossible things with their bodies.
And, I'm sure that there is far more waiting to be discovered.
I think some individuals become a bit confused at all the talk of energy. Many still making this some sublime, elusive or intangible. Yet, when we stop and think about it, energy is everything. Sounds, light, color, frequency, all interweaving and interacting to produce everything.
They are already using sound to levitate objects, (acoustic levitation) not just in laboratory experiments, but in manufacturing where they don't want the friction of object on object contact. Mainly in microchip construction.
In any case, as I said at the beginning, 100 years is a long time in terms of discovery, invention, understanding. Especially given where we are now.
I think reality is going to look very different, personally.
Peace.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen